Dark Mode
More forecasts: Johannesburg 14 days weather
  • Saturday, 15 November 2025

What's behind Rachel Reeves's 'hokey cokey' on income tax rises?

What's behind Rachel Reeves's 'hokey cokey' on income tax rises?

After weeks of predicting that she will and will not be able to raise income taxes in the Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has now decided against the manifesto-breaching move. Here's what we do know about the Budget Crisis, amid the confusion of speculation. The proposal, which would raise income tax rates by 2 p. M. , was sent to the OBR as an option earlier this month to be costed, in order to fill what was then a £30 billion deficit in the public budget, mainly due to a productivity decline. The so-called 2 up, 2 down initiative, which was pioneered by the Resolution Foundation, would have raised several billion pounds, mainly from non-wage income such as landlords and savings. The OBR's latest estimates indicate that wages and tax receipts will have risen to their predicted success in the coming years and offset many billion pounds of the difference, bringing the total amount closer to £20 billion. As a result, the proposal to raise income tax rates in the latest batch of steps sent to the OBR to review hasn't been implemented. Although this iterative process is part of the normal forecasting round that comes before a Budget, the chancellor's prediction that tax rates will rise in a BBC interview on Monday. On Friday, Health Minister Wes Streeting confirmed that the shift away from anything that could be seen to discredit election promises is inevitable:

We keep our promises and stand by our manifesto. The fact that there has been rumors about income tax shows how difficult the situation is with public budgets and secondly that the chancellor is determined to adhere to her fiscal laws,
he said. Given Downing St's comments about leadership bids and assertions of the prime minister's unique clout over bond markets, there's some irony in his remarks. As a result of the tense debate over income tax, the bond markets were more jittery by the end of the week. It's always difficult to see a single motive behind the debt markets' nimble financial strength, but let me try to figure out what happened in the last 24 hours. Following the Financial Times' coverage of the removal of the tax rate plan, there was a significant rise in the government's effective borrowing cost. It was up 0. 12% points for a 10-year gilt. Markets had been reassured by the chancellor's frank fiscal talk over the past month. In the midst of a weaker labour market, a large part of this was fueled by anticipations of lower Bank of England interest rates. The chancellor's willingness to take political pain in the form of breaking tax rate manifesto pledges in order to discourage borrowing in a straightforward manner is a plus for the bond vigilantes.

However, this week's events, which included the removal of other kites being flown, as well as entrepreneurs leaving the UK, raised concerns about the willingness to trade political pain for lower bond yields. Even as it was announced that improved - or less bad - economic forecasts had helped eliminate the budget deficit and made room to avoid the tax hike, the markets remained for a short time before rising to even higher effective rates by the end of the day. The jitters are back. According to insiders, the chancellor's Budget policy remains the same to raise the bar or headroom on meeting her borrowing limits significantly higher from the previous £10 billion a year, to address rising inflation pressures, and making right decisions on taxation. That would imply an extension to the £40 billion a year tax ceiling, which raises an additional £8 billion yearly as more employee's salaries rise into the higher tax brackets. Ministers detail how they intend to raise tax as well as the amount, indicating a squeeze on income, capital, and income from those sources rather than long-suffering pay packets. There are legitimate concerns regarding the loose lips surrounding Whitehall, which have sparked all sorts of significant tax reforms and their consequences in markets. It's also important to mention that final decisions on the Budget haven't been reached, and the process continues. Everyone is hoping that everything from here to the big speech on November 26 will be smoother.

Comment / Reply From