High Court Begins Hearing Constitutional Challenges to Australia's Under-16 Social Media Ban
-
Post By
Emmie
- November 3, 2026
Australia's world-first legislation banning children under 16 from holding accounts on major social media platforms faced its first major legal test on Tuesday as the High Court in Canberra began hearing constitutional challenges against the law.
The two-day hearing involves separate legal actions brought by online forum Reddit and the Digital Freedom Project, an advocacy group led by New South Wales Libertarian MP John Ruddick. The petitioners argue that the ban impermissibly restricts the implied freedom of political communication guaranteed under the Australian Constitution and robs young citizens of a primary modern communication outlet.
The law, which went into effect last December, requires ten designated digital platforms; Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, Snapchat, X, Kick, Threads, and Twitch, to take reasonable steps to prevent users under the age of 16 from maintaining active accounts.
Speaking outside the courtroom on Tuesday, Communications Minister Anika Wells framed the proceedings as a vital defense of government oversight and public safety:
"We are here to defend a fundamental tenet of Australian democracy, which is an Australian's right, and particularly an Australian child's right, to be free from harm. We seek to defend that from sustained ideological attack."
Inside the courtroom, legal representation for Reddit argued that the ban restricts young people from participating in essential public discussions, political discourse, and interactive features like "Ask Me Anything" sessions with elected officials.
Barrister Perry Herzfeld, representing Reddit, argued that the policy was "ill thought out", lacked proper public consultation, and contradicted earlier advice from online safety authorities.
Addressing the lawsuit, Reddit Chief Communications Officer Adam Collins outlined the company's position:
"As we challenge this law in court, we'll continue to comply with it and advocate for more effective youth safety measures."
The Digital Freedom Project similarly contended that the law enforces broad censorship. Teenager Noah Jones, who turned 16 since the suit was filed and previously served as a lead plaintiff alongside fellow teen Macy Neyland, spoke outside the court regarding youth participation:
"If the children aren't collaborating and sharing their own views, then they're just spectators in their own world.”
Both teenagers were formally removed as direct plaintiffs prior to the hearing to protect them from potential legal cost liabilities should the challenge fail. The federal government has subsequently questioned whether the Digital Freedom Project possesses the legal standing required to bring the case without direct individual plaintiffs.
Government counsel Joanna Davidson SC began outlining the Commonwealth's defense, arguing that the law fulfills a legitimate public protection interest by shielding minors from addictive algorithmic feeds, infinite scroll mechanisms, and hazardous online content.
The legal battle comes amid growing scrutiny regarding the practical effectiveness of the ban. Government research released earlier this year indicated that up to 70 per cent of underage users continued accessing banned platforms by circumventing age verification checks, which rely on photo IDs, credit card details, or facial scans.
Despite the widespread circumvention, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reported that over 5 million accounts have been suspended across the ten restricted platforms since the legislation took effect.
The eSafety Commissioner has initiated formal investigations into alleged non-compliance by major services including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube. Under the law, platforms face financial penalties of up to A$49.5 million to A$99 million ($34.5 million to $70 million USD) for repeated or systemic breaches, though no fines have been formally issued to date. Educational tools such as YouTube Kids and Google Classroom, as well as messaging apps like WhatsApp and gaming sites like Roblox, remain exempt from the restrictions.